AMD (Advanced Micro Devices)

Q2-2026 Revenue

$11.54B

vs. $7.69B a year earlier — quarterly record

Data Center Revenue

$6.72B

+107% Y/Y | 58% of total revenue

Non-GAAP Operating Income

$3.09B

27% margin vs. 12% a year earlier

Non-GAAP Diluted EPS

$1.66

vs. $0.48 a year earlier

Free Cash Flow

$1.56B

13.5% margin vs. 15.4% a year earlier

Q3-2026 Outlook

~$13.0B

Per company management, ±$300M

1 Company Profile

Advanced Micro Devices is a fabless semiconductor designer — it designs chips and outsources their manufacturing — operating across four reporting segments: Data Center — EPYC server processors and Instinct accelerators for artificial-intelligence workloads; Client — Ryzen processors for personal computers; Gaming — graphics cards and semi-custom chips for game consoles; and Embedded — components for industrial, communications and automotive applications. Client and Gaming are reported together as a single operating segment. Approximately 70% of sales are generated outside the United States. The ZT Systems manufacturing operation, divested in the fourth quarter of 2025, is presented as discontinued operations across all periods.

Segment	Q2-2026 Revenue	Q2-2025	Change	Segment Operating Income	Margin
Data Center	$6,718M	$3,240M	+107%	$2,103M	31.3%
Client & Gaming	$3,841M	$3,621M	+6%	$582M	15.2%
— of which: Client	~$3,062M	~$2,489M	+23%	—	—
— of which: Gaming	$779M	~$1,132M	-31%	—	—
Embedded	$977M	$824M	+19%	$386M	39.5%
Other (unallocated)	—	—	—	($1,081M)	—
Total	$11,536M	$7,685M	+50%	$1,990M	17.3%

The "Other" line consists of $544M of amortization of acquisition-related intangible assets and $503M of stock-based compensation. Segment margin percentages are [calculated].

A figure that must be established before any year-over-year comparison. The second quarter of 2025 included a one-time charge of $800M for inventory and related costs, following United States export controls on Instinct MI308 accelerators [Form 8-K Exhibit 99.1, footnotes (1) and (2)]. The charge was recorded within cost of sales, which means it distorts every margin comparison against the year-ago quarter. The year-over-year growth rates below are therefore measured against a depressed base.

2 Financial Performance

This section is not a recommendation. It is a factual listing of reported financial metrics.

Profitability — quarter versus comparable periods ($M)

Metric	Q2 2026	Q2 2025	Q1 2026
Revenue	11,536	7,685	10,253
Gross profit (GAAP)	6,203	3,059	5,416
Gross margin (GAAP)	54%	40%	53%
Gross margin (non-GAAP)	56%	43%	55%
Operating income (loss), GAAP	1,990	(134)	1,476
Operating income, non-GAAP	3,094	897	2,540
Operating margin, non-GAAP	27%	12%	25%
Net income, GAAP	2,297	872	1,383
Diluted EPS, GAAP	$1.38	$0.54	$0.84
Net income, non-GAAP	2,760	781	2,265
Diluted EPS, non-GAAP	$1.66	$0.48	$1.37

GAAP-to-non-GAAP reconciliation items for Q2-2026: stock-based compensation $503M; amortization of acquisition-related intangibles $544M; acquisition and other costs $40M; legal-matter provision $17M [Form 8-K Exhibit 99.1, reconciliation table].

Gross margin — the normalized reading. Adding the $800M charge back, the adjusted gross margin in the second quarter of 2025 was approximately 53.7%. Against 56% in the current quarter, the actual expansion is approximately 2.3 percentage points, not 13. On the same normalized basis, adjusted operating income in Q2-2025 was approximately $1,697M (22.1% margin), so adjusted operating income growth is approximately +82% rather than +245%, and operating-margin expansion is approximately 4.7 points rather than 15. A complementary figure: per company management, the non-GAAP gross margin outlook for the third quarter is approximately 56% — flat sequentially, despite a higher Data Center mix.

[Assumption] — the normalization above attributes the full $800M charge to the Data Center segment. MI308 is a Data Center product, but an explicit segment split of the charge has not been verified against the footnote.

Operating expenses ($M)

Line item	Q2 2026	Q2 2025	Change
Research and development	2,528	1,894	+33%
Marketing, general and administrative	1,401	991	+41%
Amortization of acquisition-related intangibles (in opex)	284	308	-8%
Total operating expenses	4,213	3,193	+32%
Stock-based compensation	503	369	+36%
Effective tax rate	9.8%	—	—

Stock-based compensation represents 4.4% of revenue in the quarter [calculated]. The prior-year tax rate was distorted by an $853M release of tax valuation allowances. The company states an adjusted tax-rate assumption of 13% for 2026 [Form 8-K Exhibit 99.1, footnote].

Reported results versus the company's prior outlook

The guidance issued for the second quarter was revenue of $11.2B ± $300M and non-GAAP gross margin of approximately 56% [Q1-2026 results release, 5 May 2026]. Reported: $11,536M and 56%. Revenue came in $336M above the mid-point of the range (+3.0%) [calculated] — at the upper end of the guided band. The gross margin landed exactly on the guided figure, not above it.

Company outlook and announced commitments

Item	Figure	Nature
Q3-2026 revenue, per company management	~$13.0B ±$300M	+41% Y/Y, +13% sequential at mid-point [calculated]
Q3-2026 non-GAAP gross margin, per company management	~56%	Flat sequentially
Full-year 2026 outlook	Not provided	Neither in the release nor in the quarterly report
OpenAI (October 2025)	Up to 6 gigawatts	Stated deployment intent; first gigawatt on Instinct MI450
Meta (February 2026)	Up to 6 gigawatts	Stated deployment intent; first gigawatt on Instinct MI450
Anthropic	Up to 2 gigawatts	MI450 accelerators within Helios racks
Helios platform	Shipments in the second half of 2026	AMD supplies components; it does not manufacture or sell the completed racks

Management statements, quoted with attribution: Lisa Su, Chair and CEO — "We enter the second half with strong momentum as EPYC demand accelerates, Instinct deployments scale and Helios begins to ramp." The Chief Financial Officer stated that the company anticipates Data Center sales to accelerate in the second half of 2026, driving stronger overall revenue growth and continued earnings expansion [Form 8-K Exhibit 99.1]. These are company statements, not conclusions of this analysis.

Three factual clarifications regarding the artificial-intelligence figures. First — AMD does not disclose Instinct accelerator revenue or data-center graphics revenue separately. The only available figure is total segment revenue, which also includes EPYC processors. Second — a gigawatt is a unit of electrical power, not a purchase order. The commitments are described in the filings as deployment intent, the company does not publish an average price per gigawatt, and therefore no revenue figure can be derived from them. Third — revenue recognized over time (custom products and development services) fell to 4% of revenue, from 12% a year earlier.

3 Balance Sheet & Capital

Balance sheet ($M)

Line item	27 Jun 2026	27 Dec 2025	Change
Cash and cash equivalents	5,086	5,539	-453
Short-term investments	8,025	5,013	+3,012
Cash + short-term investments	13,111	10,552	+2,559
Accounts receivable, net	7,281	6,315	+966
Inventory	8,468	7,920	+548
Total current assets	31,522	26,947	+4,575
Total assets	84,464	76,926	+7,538
Accounts payable	5,359	2,929	+2,430 (+83%)
Current portion of debt	875	874	+1
Total current liabilities	12,081	9,455	+2,626
Long-term debt	2,351	2,348	+3
Total debt	3,226	—	—
Net cash [calculated]	9,885	—	—
Shareholders' equity	67,224	62,999	+4,225

Net cash [calculated]: $13,111M − $3,226M = $9,885M.

August 2026 senior notes offering — an event that post-dates the quarterly report

On 13 August 2026 AMD filed an automatic shelf registration statement (Form S-3ASR, file 333-298288), and on 14 August 2026 it completed an offering of senior notes totalling $4.75 billion in four tranches [Form 424B5, 14 August 2026]:

Tranche	Principal	Coupon	Maturity
2029 notes	$1,250M	4.600%	17 August 2029
2031 notes	$1,500M	5.000%	17 August 2031
2033 notes	$1,000M	5.250%	17 August 2033
2036 notes	$1,000M	5.500%	17 August 2036
Total	$4,750M	—	—

Net proceeds were approximately $4.7 billion after underwriting discounts and estimated expenses [Form 424B5, "Use of Proceeds"]. The stated use of proceeds, quoted from the prospectus supplement, is: "general corporate purposes, which may include the repayment of debt." The notes are unsecured, are not guaranteed by subsidiaries, and are not listed on any securities exchange. Incremental annual interest cost is approximately $240M [calculated: 1,250×4.6% + 1,500×5.0% + 1,000×5.25% + 1,000×5.5%].

Pro-forma capitalization following the offering ($M)

Line item	Actual 27 Jun 2026	Pro-forma after offering	Source
Cash and cash equivalents	5,086	9,812	[424B5, capitalization table]
Short-term investments	8,025	8,025	[424B5]
Cash + investments	13,111	17,837	[calculated]
Total debt	3,226	~7,976	[calculated]
Net cash	9,885	~9,861	[calculated]

Three facts that follow from the offering, stated without interpretation of merit. First — gross debt increases by a factor of approximately 2.47, from $3.2B to approximately $8.0B. Second — net cash is essentially unchanged, at approximately $9.9B before and after; the transaction increases both sides of the balance sheet rather than the net position. Third — the stated use of proceeds is the broadest formulation available under the disclosure rules, and the filings do not specify a designated use beyond it. These are the facts on the record as of 14 August 2026; the quarterly report itself pre-dates the offering and therefore does not reflect it.

Cash flow and working capital ($M)

Metric	Q2 2026	Q1 2026	Q2 2025
Cash from operations	2,366	2,955	1,462
Operating cash flow margin	21%	29%	19%
Capital expenditure	(808)	(389)	(282)
Free cash flow	1,558	2,566	1,180
Free cash flow margin	13.5%	25%	15.4%

Working-capital movement in the quarter	$M
Accounts receivable	(1,246)
Inventory	(423)
Prepaid expenses	(683)
Accounts payable	+2,274
Net	(78)

For the first six months of 2026: cash from operations $5,321M (vs. $2,401M), capital expenditure $1,197M (vs. $494M), free cash flow $4,124M (vs. $1,907M). Gains on long-term investments were $483M in the quarter versus $38M a year earlier, which is why GAAP net income ($2,297M) exceeds GAAP operating income ($1,990M).

How to read the increase in accounts payable. Accounts payable rose to $5,359M from $2,929M at year-end — an increase of 83%, against revenue growth of 50%. Two readings exist in the literature and both are consistent with the disclosure: the first — an extension of supplier credit terms, which does not repeat; the second — advance procurement of manufacturing capacity and components ahead of higher volumes, which reflects a supply constraint rather than cash weakness. A balance-sheet fact that constrains both readings: net working-capital movement in the quarter was negative by approximately $78M — meaning the increase in payables offset parallel outflows in receivables, inventory and prepaid expenses, and did not add net cash. Capital expenditure nearly tripled versus the year-ago quarter, and free cash flow fell 39% sequentially while revenue rose 13%.

Shares, buybacks and customer warrants

Item	Figure
Shares outstanding (29 July 2026)	1,632,475,042
Diluted share count in the quarter	1,659M
Share repurchases in the second quarter	$0
Share repurchases in the first half	1.1M shares for $221M
Remaining repurchase authorization	$9.2B (of $14B)
Treasury shares retired in the quarter	66.9M
Dividend	None

Customer warrants — the item with the largest potential effect in the report. The company has issued warrants to OpenAI and to Meta, each for up to 160 million shares at an exercise price of $0.01 — up to 320 million shares in total, against 1,632 million shares outstanding, or up to approximately 19.6% of the current share count. Vesting is conditioned on milestones tied to Instinct accelerator purchases as well as share-price and performance conditions. As of 27 June 2026 no tranche had vested, no tranche was exercisable, and no effect had been recorded in the income statement.

How the accounting standard classifies consideration of this type. Consideration payable by a vendor to a customer is accounted for under the revenue-recognition standard as a reduction of the transaction price — that is, a reduction of revenue — rather than as an operating expense, unless it is provided in exchange for a distinct good or service. Where the consideration is settled in equity instruments, it is measured at grant date under the applicable measurement guidance, presented as a reduction of revenue, and accrued as the related revenue is recognized and once the milestones become probable. The practical consequence: while the milestones are not probable there is no entry at all; once they become probable, the entry reduces revenue and gross margin — and does not appear as a separate expense line.

The fully diluted arithmetic [calculated]. The diluted share count in the quarter is 1,659 million. Adding the 320 million warrant shares gives a base of 1,979 million. Non-GAAP net income of $2,760M divided by 1,979 million shares gives approximately $1.39 per share, against the $1.66 reported — a reduction of approximately 16.2%. Vesting, if it occurs, would fall in the same period in which the revenue that triggers it is recognized.

4 Segments

Segment operating income and margin ($M)

Segment	Q2-2026	Margin	Q1-2026	Margin	Q2-2025	Margin
Data Center	2,103	31.3%	1,599	27.7%	(155)	negative
Client & Gaming	582	15.2%	575	15.9%	767	21.2%
Embedded	386	39.5%	338	38.7%	275	33.4%

Two opposing movements inside the same quarter. Data Center — segment margin rose from 27.7% to 31.3% sequentially. On a normalized basis, adding the $800M charge back to the year-ago quarter, the segment margin moves from approximately 19.9% to 31.3% — an expansion of approximately 11.4 points [calculated, with the attribution assumption noted above]. At current scale, the accelerator mix is not diluting segment margin. Client & Gaming — revenue rose 6% year over year, while segment operating income fell from $767M to $582M, a decline of 24%, and the margin eroded from 21.2% to 15.2%. Gaming fell 31% on lower semi-custom console products. This movement is unrelated to the $800M base effect.

Six-quarter revenue trend ($M)

Segment	Q1-25	Q2-25	Q3-25	Q4-25	Q1-26	Q2-26
Data Center	3,674	3,240	4,341	5,380	5,775	6,718
Client	2,294	~2,489	2,750	3,097	2,885	~3,062
Gaming	647	~1,132	1,298	843	720	779
Embedded	823	824	857	950	873	977
Total	7,438	7,685	9,246	10,270	10,253	11,536

Annual revenue: 2021 — $16,434M | 2022 — $23,601M | 2023 — $22,680M | 2024 — $25,785M | 2025 — $34,639M. For full-year 2025: GAAP gross margin 50%, operating income $3,694M, net income $4.3B, diluted EPS $2.65; on a non-GAAP basis — gross margin 52%, operating income $7.8B, net income $6.8B, EPS $4.17. Data Center represented 58% of company revenue in the quarter [CFO statement, Form 8-K Exhibit 99.1].

Products and platforms launched in the quarter

Per the "Recent Highlights" section of the results release: AMD Helios, a rack-scale server platform, being deployed at Anthropic, Cirrascale, HUMAIN, Meta, Microsoft, OpenAI, Oracle, Tensorwave and Vultr; the Instinct MI400 Series, including MI455X for large-scale training and inference and MI430X for high-performance and sovereign AI computing; sixth-generation EPYC processors; the ROCm.ai development environment; Instinct MI350P for accelerating existing infrastructure; the acquisition of MEXT (predictive memory technology); an expanded collaboration with Microsoft covering Helios racks on Azure, two new EPYC-based virtual-machine series and broader Pensando deployment; a collaboration with Cerebras on ultra-low-latency inference; and Cisco systems based on Ryzen AI Halo.

Quarterly Revenue ($M)

Segment Mix — Q2-2026

Data Center — Year-over-Year ($M)

Margins (%)

Diluted EPS ($)

Segment Operating Income ($M)

5 Competitive Position

AMD competes on three fronts simultaneously. In server processors it competes against Intel. In artificial-intelligence accelerators for data centers it competes against Nvidia, the dominant player in that category. In processors for personal computers it competes against Intel and against ARM-architecture processors. In addition, the large cloud providers are developing their own custom silicon, which competes for the same infrastructure and the same power budget.

Front	Competitors	Position per the filings
AI accelerators	Nvidia; cloud-provider custom silicon	Segment operating margin of 31.3% [calculated]
Server processors	Intel	Included in the same segment — not broken out in the disclosure
Client processors	Intel, ARM-based vendors	Units +34% Y/Y; average selling price per processor -6% Y/Y
Gaming	Nvidia; console manufacturers	-31% Y/Y, driven mainly by lower semi-custom console products

Two structural points about this category. The first — the structure of the value chain. Within the Helios platform, AMD supplies components but does not manufacture or sell the completed racks. Its revenue content per rack is lower than the total system value, and it is not disclosed. The second — the supply constraint. Shipment pace in this category is determined not only by demand but also by the allocation of advanced packaging capacity and HBM memory at subcontractors. This condition is not disclosed in the financial reports, and it is relevant to reading the increase in capital expenditure and in accounts payable.

6 How to Think About This Company

The second quarter of 2026 is the strongest quarter in the company's history, and it is also the quarter in which a gap opened between reported revenue and ownership of that revenue. Revenue rose 50% to $11.54B, Data Center revenue more than doubled to $6.72B, and non-GAAP EPS rose from $0.48 to $1.66. All three figures are correct and verified against the filings. The question the analysis has to answer is what stands behind them, and who is paying for them.

The number that must be established before any comparison. The year-ago quarter included a one-time $800M inventory charge following export controls on MI308 accelerators. The charge was recorded in cost of sales. Adding it back, the prior-year adjusted gross margin was approximately 53.7% — so the actual expansion is approximately 2.3 percentage points, not 13. A complementary figure: per company management, the third-quarter non-GAAP gross margin outlook is approximately 56%, flat sequentially, despite a higher Data Center mix. Revenue growth of 50% that does not produce gross-margin expansion is a mix change, not operating leverage.

The item with the largest potential effect in the report does not appear in the income statement. The company has issued warrants to OpenAI and to Meta, each for up to 160 million shares at an exercise price of one cent — up to 320 million shares in total, approximately 19.6% of shares outstanding. Vesting is conditioned on Instinct purchase milestones and on share-price conditions. As of the balance-sheet date no tranche had vested and no effect had been recorded. In plain terms: the company is granting ownership in itself to two customers, as consideration for purchasing its products.

How the accounting standard classifies this — and why that matters. Consideration payable by a vendor to a customer is treated under the revenue-recognition standard as a reduction of the transaction price, that is, a reduction of revenue, and not as an operating expense — unless it is given in exchange for a distinct good or service. Where the consideration is equity-settled, it is measured at grant date under the applicable measurement guidance and accrued as the related revenue is recognized, from the point at which the milestones become probable. The practical meaning: this is not "an expense that will appear later" — it is future revenue that will be reported lower. And the entry arrives in exactly the same period as the revenue that triggers it.

The August financing changes the shape of the balance sheet without changing the net position. On 14 August 2026, after the quarter closed, the company completed a $4.75B senior notes offering across four tranches, with net proceeds of approximately $4.7B. On a pro-forma basis, cash and equivalents move from $5,086M to $9,812M, total debt moves from $3,226M to approximately $7,976M, and net cash is essentially unchanged at approximately $9.9B. The stated use of proceeds is general corporate purposes, which may include the repayment of debt. The filings do not specify anything narrower. The observable facts: gross debt roughly 2.47 times higher, approximately $240M of incremental annual interest cost [calculated], and a net position that did not move.

The variables to monitor. First, EPS on a fully diluted basis — 1,659 million shares plus 320 million gives 1,979 million; $1.66 becomes approximately $1.39, a reduction of approximately 16.2%. Second, days payable in the next quarter — the line rose 83% year-to-date against revenue growth of 50%. Third, fourth-quarter revenue — the third-quarter outlook is approximately $13.0B per company management, and the statement about second-half acceleration would require a materially higher figure in the following quarter in order to be borne out. Fourth, Data Center segment operating margin — 31.3% today. Fifth, the deployment of the newly raised proceeds, which the filings do not designate.

Where the analysis can go wrong — first error: reading the jump in accounts payable as cash-flow engineering. Payables rose $2,274M in the quarter, and it is easy to conclude that operating cash flow was "bought" from suppliers. The full check shows that net working-capital movement was negative by approximately $78M — the increase in payables offset parallel outflows in receivables, inventory and prepaid expenses. Isolating one line while ignoring the outflows it offsets is a biased calculation. The careful reading: this may be advance procurement of capacity and components, which is a marker of a supply constraint rather than of weakness.

Where the analysis can go wrong — second error: converting gigawatts into revenue. The announced commitments total up to 14 gigawatts of stated deployment intent. A gigawatt is a unit of electrical power, not a purchase order. AMD does not publish an average price per gigawatt, does not manufacture the completed Helios racks but supplies components into them, and does not disclose Instinct revenue separately. Any translation of "14 gigawatts" into a specific dollar figure rests on assumptions that cannot be verified from the filings.

What is happening beneath the headline — the core. Segment operating income in Client & Gaming fell to $582M from $767M, despite higher segment revenue. Segment margin fell from 21.2% to 15.2%. Gaming fell 31%. In parallel, the average selling price per client processor fell 6% while units rose 34%. This is the side of the business that does not benefit from the artificial-intelligence cycle, and it is weakening while the headline strengthens.

Capital allocation — three decisions that should be read together. In the second quarter no shares were repurchased under the buyback program, despite a remaining authorization of $9.2B and net cash of approximately $9.9B. Over the same period, commitments to issue up to 320 million shares at one cent remain in force. Six weeks after quarter-end, the company raised $4.75B of debt without designating a use. Two readings are consistent with these facts: the first — cash is earmarked for advance procurement of manufacturing capacity, a coherent move in a supply-constrained market; the second — a pricing consideration on the buyback. The filings do not resolve between them.

What separates professional analysis from a tip. A tip says "revenue rose 50% and EPS tripled." Analysis asks three different questions: (a) how much of the margin improvement is comparison base rather than execution; (b) across how many shares the profit is divided once existing equity commitments are taken into account; (c) what the company chooses not to disclose, and what that implies. A tip is an outcome. Analysis is a process that keeps running into the next quarter.

Where this analysis sits. This analysis describes conditions and variables to monitor, not a conclusion. It does not determine whether the pricing of the security is right or wrong, and it does not propose any action. This site does not participate in the decision. The decision belongs to the client.

The difference between surface-level analysis and professional thinking often lies in the variables that are not immediately visible.

7 Risks & Monitoring

Item	Current context (second quarter 2026)
Customer warrants	Up to 320 million shares at $0.01 to OpenAI and Meta — up to approximately 19.6% of the share count. Not yet vested and not yet recorded. Under the revenue-recognition standard, vendor consideration payable to a customer is presented as a reduction of revenue once the milestones become probable
Gross margin without leverage	Normalized expansion is approximately 2.3 points against revenue growth of 50%. The third-quarter outlook is flat sequentially at approximately 56%, per company management
Erosion in Client & Gaming	Segment operating income fell to $582M from $767M despite higher revenue. Margin fell from 21.2% to 15.2% [calculated]
Gaming	-31% Y/Y
Cash-flow quality	Free cash flow margin fell to 13.5% from 15.4% despite revenue growth of 50%, and fell 39% sequentially. Capital expenditure nearly tripled year over year
Accounts payable	Up 83% year-to-date against revenue growth of 50%. Days payable should be examined in the next quarter
New debt and interest cost	$4.75B issued in August 2026; gross debt rises to approximately $8.0B; incremental annual interest cost approximately $240M [calculated]; use of proceeds stated only as general corporate purposes
No full-year outlook	No outlook was provided for full-year 2026, alongside management's statement regarding second-half acceleration
No Instinct revenue disclosure	The filings do not permit calculating the share of AI accelerators within segment revenue, or their margin
Customer concentration	The quarterly report does not detail material customers for the quarter. The announced commitments are concentrated in a small number of customers
Low tax rate	The effective tax rate in the quarter was 9.8%. The company's stated adjusted tax-rate assumption for 2026 is 13%
Absence of buybacks	Zero share repurchases in the quarter against a $9.2B authorization and net cash of approximately $9.9B
International exposure	Approximately 70% of sales are outside the United States. The year-ago quarter included an $800M charge following export controls
Non-operating share of earnings	Gains on long-term investments of $483M in the quarter (vs. $38M) mean GAAP net income exceeds GAAP operating income

This section lists risks and items under monitoring. It deliberately does not present "positive catalysts", because a list of that kind reads as a directional statement.

8 Scenario Framework

The framework below describes which conditions would need to hold under each scenario — it contains no price figures and no probabilities. These conditions are what a professional portfolio manager tracks over time, and what allows assumptions to be revised as reality changes.

Scenarios are descriptive, not predictive. They outline possible conditions, not expected outcomes.
No likelihood is assigned to any scenario, no direction is preferred, and no view is offered as to which one may occur.

🟢 Scenario A — conditions for a stronger operating outcome

Fourth-quarter revenue grows sequentially at a faster rate than the sequential rate implied by the third-quarter outlook — that is, genuine acceleration rather than continuation
Non-GAAP gross margin rises above the current 56% level as Helios shipments broaden
Days payable stabilize, and free cash flow grows faster than revenue
Segment operating income in Client & Gaming returns to growth in absolute dollars
The company begins disclosing Instinct revenue separately, or some utilization metric
Data Center segment operating margin rises above 31.3% as volumes scale
The use of the newly raised proceeds is specified, and is tied to capacity or to identified assets

What that would mean: under these conditions, the quarter reads as the beginning of genuine operating leverage rather than a mix shift, and the announced commitments begin to become quantifiable.

🔵 Scenario B — conditions for continuation of the current pattern

Revenue continues to grow sequentially at a single-digit to low-double-digit rate
Non-GAAP gross margin holds in the range of roughly 55%–57%
Data Center segment operating margin holds around the 30% area
The warrants begin vesting gradually, and the accounting entry reduces revenue in parallel with its growth
Free cash flow grows more slowly than revenue because of elevated capital expenditure
Gross debt remains at the post-offering level and interest cost is absorbed within operating results

What that would mean: under these conditions, the company reads as the number-two player in a growing category — a business that is growing quickly, but where part of the value it creates transfers to its customers as equity consideration.

🔴 Scenario C — conditions for deterioration

Fourth-quarter revenue does not exceed the third-quarter outlook range meaningfully — "acceleration" without numerical expression
Days payable shorten, and free cash flow disappoints even in a quarter that exceeds the outlook
Non-GAAP gross margin retreats below the 55% area as rack shipments broaden
Client & Gaming operating income continues to decline in dollars
The warrant milestones become probable and the accounting entry begins reducing reported revenue
Inventory grows faster than revenue, or purchase commitments do not convert into shipments
Further debt is raised without a specified use while free cash flow does not cover capital expenditure

What that would mean: under these conditions, growth reads as having been purchased with equity consideration and with credit terms, and the gap between reported revenue and the value retained by shareholders widens.

This framework describes conditions. It contains no price figures, no valuation conclusion and no probabilities. The analyst updates the assumptions each quarter based on what is actually reported. Detailed sensitivity work is available to qualified clients of the Family Office.

9 Analytical Lens — the questions we ask

In professional company analysis, the question is not "is this good", but "which angles must a company be examined from in order not to miss what matters". At Bakshi Finance, every analysis passes through six angles. The text below is not an assessment. It is the mapping of the questions this analysis is meant to answer.

What the lens is not: there is no rating, no ranking, no comparison between this company and any other, and no preference. The same six questions are asked of every company on this site — what varies is the answers, not the instrument.

This framework is intended to structure analysis, not to produce an investment conclusion.

Growth

Data Center revenue more than doubled to $6.72B, and the segment represents 58% of revenue. The question: how much of that growth comes from EPYC processors and how much from Instinct accelerators — a split that is not disclosed? What is the segment's growth rate once the weak comparison base, which included a one-time charge, is normalized? Why was no full-year outlook provided alongside the statement about second-half acceleration?

Profitability

Non-GAAP gross margin moved from approximately 53.7% on a normalized basis to 56% — roughly 2.3 points, on revenue growth of 50%. The question: why does growth of that magnitude not produce operating leverage at the gross-margin line? What is AMD's revenue content within a Helios rack that it does not manufacture? Why is the third-quarter gross-margin outlook flat sequentially despite a higher Data Center mix?

Leverage

Net cash of approximately $9.9B, debt of $3.2B at quarter-end rising to approximately $8.0B after the August offering, and zero buybacks in the quarter against a $9.2B authorization. The question: what is the cash designated for — advance procurement of capacity, an acquisition, or a buffer? Why raise $4.75B while holding a net cash position, and why is the use of proceeds stated only in the broadest form? Was the 83% increase in accounts payable an extension of credit terms or advance procurement, and what will happen to days payable next quarter?

Competitive Position

Data Center segment operating margin is 31.3%. The question: what is the gap versus the dominant player in the category, and where does it come from — mix, price, or cost structure? Does the gap narrow as the market moves to complete racks, or widen because AMD supplies components only? How does cloud-provider custom silicon compete for the same deployment budget?

Management Quality

Management has announced intent-based commitments totalling up to 14 gigawatts, and has granted warrants for up to 320 million shares at $0.01. The question: what is the value of the consideration granted relative to the revenue it is meant to trigger? Is the decision not to repurchase shares in the quarter — while simultaneously committing to issue shares to customers at a nominal price, and while raising unsecured debt — a consistent capital-allocation framework?

Business Complexity / Risk

The report contains a potential equity commitment of up to approximately 19.6% of the share count that appears on no line of the income statement. The question: how does one analyze a company where the item with the largest effect is not yet measured? What is EPS on a fully diluted basis, and when would recognition begin? How does one read a "gigawatt" metric that cannot be converted into revenue?

10 Key Observations

1. The business identity. Advanced Micro Devices is a fabless semiconductor designer, with revenue of $11.54B in the second quarter of 2026 — a quarterly record. The Data Center segment represents 58% of revenue, and approximately 70% of sales are generated outside the United States.

2. The financial backbone. Non-GAAP operating margin of 27%, net cash of approximately $9.9B, and free cash flow of $1.56B in the quarter. Data Center segment operating income was $2.10B, a margin of 31.3%. Following the August 2026 offering, gross debt stands at approximately $8.0B on a pro-forma basis while net cash is essentially unchanged.

3. The current critical intersection. Revenue grew 50% while non-GAAP gross margin expanded by approximately 2.3 points from a normalized base, and the third-quarter outlook for that margin is flat sequentially per company management. In parallel, commitments exist to issue up to 320 million shares at $0.01 to two customers — up to approximately 19.6% of the share count — which have not yet vested and have not yet been recorded.

4. What matters for monitoring. EPS on a fully diluted basis including the warrants; days payable in the next quarter; fourth-quarter revenue against management's statement about acceleration; Data Center segment operating margin; the deployment of the $4.7B of net proceeds raised in August; and whether the company begins disclosing Instinct accelerator revenue separately.

This summary is not a recommendation. It is a factual listing of what the analysis identified. The decision belongs to the client.

11 Sources & Data

#	Source	Date	Type
1	SEC EDGAR — Form 8-K, Exhibit 99.1 (Q2-2026 results release), accession 0000002488-26-000121	4 August 2026	Official — SEC
2	SEC EDGAR — Form 10-Q for the quarter ended 27 June 2026, accession 0000002488-26-000123	5 August 2026	Official — SEC
3	SEC EDGAR — Form S-3ASR automatic shelf registration statement, file 333-298288	13 August 2026	Official — SEC
4	SEC EDGAR — Form 424B5 prospectus supplement (senior notes offering), accession 0001193125-26-352628	14 August 2026	Official — SEC
5	SEC EDGAR — Q1-2026, Q4-2025 and Q3-2025 results releases	2025–2026	Official — SEC
6	SEC EDGAR — Form 10-K for 2025 and XBRL data	2026	Official — SEC

Not verifiable from primary sources: Instinct accelerator or data-center graphics revenue separately — the company does not disclose it; any revenue figure attributable to artificial intelligence; a full-year 2026 outlook — none was provided; components of the third-quarter outlook beyond revenue and gross margin; the earnings-call transcript (not an SEC filing); material customers above 10% of revenue for the quarter; the credit assessments assigned to the new notes by the agencies. This document contains no share-price or market-capitalization data — those change continuously and are not part of the financial disclosure.

🔒

Premium Content — Qualified Investors Only

The full analysis of Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) for the second quarter of 2026 is available to premium clients of Bakshi Finance — Family Office.
Data from official filings only. Analytical review — not a recommendation, not a rating.

Open Access ₪180 per analysis · ₪2,700 per year for all analyses

🕔 Previous versions of this analysis

Full-year 2025 (Hebrew) · Archived on 07/08/2026

Previous versions are retained for documentation and comparison. They are not current and should not be relied upon as an up-to-date source of information.

Disclosure — nature of the firm: Bakshi Finance operates as a Family Office serving qualified clients only. Mr. Yaron Bakshi held a licensed investment advisory license during the years 2008–2023. As of the publication date of this document, the firm does not hold an investment advisory, investment marketing, or portfolio management license.

Disclosure — nature of the document: This document is intended for research and professional study purposes only. Nothing herein constitutes a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security, or to take any action whatsoever in securities. Nothing herein substitutes for advice tailored to the particular circumstances and needs of any individual. Every decision is the sole responsibility of the investor. This site does not participate in the investment decision.

Disclosure — data: The data were drawn from the Form 8-K (Exhibit 99.1) filed by Advanced Micro Devices with the SEC on 4 August 2026, from the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended 27 June 2026 filed on 5 August 2026, from the Form 424B5 prospectus supplement filed on 14 August 2026, and from earlier filings. Figures marked [calculated] were derived from reported data. Subsequent filings and restatements may change the picture. Past performance is not indicative of future results.

This framework is intended to structure analysis, not to produce an investment conclusion.