Arbe Robotics Ltd.

Analytical review · Interim financial statements for Q2 2026 (as at 30 June 2026)

Bakshi Finance — Family Office | Research Depth: Comprehensive

ARBE
Nasdaq · Tel Aviv Stock Exchange
Revenue — H1 2026
$1.16M
vs $0.31M in the comparable half
Operating loss — H1
$(21.2)M
vs $(24.8)M in the comparable half
Adjusted EBITDA — H1
$(18.6)M
vs $(18.6)M · no material change
Cash and short-term deposits
$41.9M
vs $53.6M at 31.3.2026
Shareholders' equity
$40.5M
Accumulated deficit $317.9M · ~127.3M shares
Gross margin — Q2
−0.9%
vs −67.5% in the comparable quarter

What this review rests on. Arbe Robotics' annual report on Form 20-F for 2025, filed with the SEC on 27 March 2026 and carrying a clean audit opinion from KPMG Somekh Chaikin; the unaudited condensed interim consolidated financial statements for the period ended 30 June 2026, furnished on 3 September 2026; ten current reports on Form 6-K through 8 September 2026; and the Series A convertible bond prospectus together with the deed of trust annexed to it, filed with the Israel Securities Authority. Market data as at the close of 8 September 2026. Every figure on this page is drawn from one of those documents. Where a figure was computed by us, that is stated explicitly.

1

Company Profile

Arbe Robotics Ltd. is an Israeli company incorporated in November 2015 that commenced operations in January 2016. Its head office is at 107 HaHashmonaim Street, Tel Aviv-Yafo, and it has two subsidiaries: Arbe Robotics US Inc. (Delaware, 2017) and Shanghai Arbe Technologies Co., Ltd. (China, 2024). The ordinary shares are listed on Nasdaq and on the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange under the symbol ARBE, the publicly traded warrants are listed on Nasdaq under ARBEW, and the convertible bonds are listed in Tel Aviv.

The company develops a 4D imaging radar chipset comprising three components: a transmitter chip, a receiver chip, and a dedicated radar processing chip containing a Radar Processing Unit (RPU) alongside general-purpose processing and control cores. The Phoenix radar system built on that chipset reaches 2,304 virtual channels, obtained by combining up to two transmitters (24 channels each) and up to four receivers (12 channels each).

In the private automotive market Arbe operates as a Tier 2 supplier — it sells the chipset to module manufacturers (Tier 1), who build radar systems from it and sell them to vehicle manufacturers (OEMs). The company has no fabrication facility of its own; manufacturing and testing of the chipset are performed by GlobalFoundries, and note 1(d) to the interim statements identifies dependence on that single supplier as an explicit risk factor.

From 2026 the company broadened its sales model: alongside chipsets it began selling complete radar systems from a dedicated production line, primarily for defense, homeland security, perimeter security and what the company terms "physical AI" applications. Its principal reported Tier 1 partners are HiRain in China and Sensrad in Sweden, whose radar systems are based on Arbe's chipset and which serves customers including Watchit, Forterra and Tianyi.

As at 31 December 2025 the company had 145 employees and consultants, nine of them engaged under consulting agreements, with 135 based in Israel. It holds 15 patent families granted in the United States, Europe, Israel, Japan and China. Research and development was partly financed through royalty-bearing grants from the Israel Innovation Authority, which create a royalty obligation of up to 100% of the grant amount and restrictions on transferring the know-how outside Israel.

2

Financial Performance

The last three reported years show a stable expense base and volatile revenue. Revenue in 2025 ($1,026 thousand) was lower than in 2023 ($1,470 thousand), while operating expenses moved within a narrow band of $46.8–48.9 million in each of the three years.

US$ thousands202320242025H1 2025H1 2026
Revenue1,4707681,0263141,164
Cost of revenues1,5081,5531,8287971,297
Gross profit (loss)(38)(785)(802)(483)(133)
Research and development, net34,08235,09134,82017,90915,112
Sales and marketing5,1945,4305,0392,6782,307
General and administrative7,5718,3477,5443,7713,626
Total operating expenses46,84748,86847,40324,35821,045
Operating loss(46,885)(49,653)(48,205)(24,841)(21,178)
Financial income, net3,3853361,7848652,662
Net loss(43,500)(49,317)(46,421)(23,976)(18,516)
Loss per share — US$(0.60)(0.61)(0.42)(0.23)(0.15)
Adjusted EBITDA———(18,637)(18,622)

The distinction between the reported line and the cash line

Net loss for H1 2026 narrowed by $5,460 thousand against the comparable half. A line-by-line breakdown shows that $5,421 thousand of the change — 99.3% of it — originated outside operating activity: a $3,351 thousand decline in share-based compensation, a $273 thousand decline in warrants to service providers, and a $1,797 thousand increase in net financial income.

The measure unaffected by those items is Adjusted EBITDA, which the company itself reports in note 12 to the interim statements: $(18,622) thousand in H1 2026 against $(18,637) thousand in H1 2025 — no material change.

Operating expenses: reported versus cash

In its Q1 report management stated that it had implemented cost-reduction measures expected to result in an approximate 15% decrease in ongoing expenses. Reported operating expenses did fall by 13.6% (from $24,358 to $21,045 thousand). Note 10(c) sets out share-based compensation by line item, which allows the non-cash component to be isolated:

US$ thousandsH1 2025H1 2026Change
Operating expenses as reported24,35821,045−13.6%
Less share-based compensation within them(5,481)(2,191)—
Less warrants to service providers(364)(91)—
Cash operating expenses18,51318,763+1.4%

Sequentially within 2026 the picture differs: cash operating expenses fell from $9,957 thousand in Q1 to $8,806 thousand in Q2 — a decline of 11.6% — and against the comparable quarter ($8,923 thousand) they are 1.3% lower. According to company management, the full effect of the cost reduction is expected to be reflected in the third quarter of 2026.

The cash operating expense figures were computed by us on the basis of note 10(c) and are not presented as such in the filing.

Revenue and gross loss — three years and half-year
US$ thousands · Source: 20-F 2025 and interim statements 30.6.2026
Operating expenses — reported versus cash
US$ thousands · cash figure net of share-based compensation
3

Balance Sheet & Capital

US$ thousands31.12.202431.12.202530.6.2026
Cash and cash equivalents13,4884,0285,037
Restricted cash280280280
Short-term bank deposits10,79340,69036,601
Total cash and deposits24,56144,99841,918
Trade receivables153571807
Other assets — funds held in escrow30,41724,52525,051
Prepaid expenses, derivatives and other receivables2,5001,6851,970
Non-current assets3,1562,0692,464
Total assets60,78773,84872,210
Convertible bonds (current liability)30,61424,75724,047
Other current liabilities5,7928,1596,281
Long-term liabilities1,8851,3631,379
Additional paid-in capital275,453338,947358,397
Accumulated deficit(252,957)(299,378)(317,894)
Total shareholders' equity22,49639,56940,503

Total capital raised into paid-in capital since inception stands at $358.4 million, against an accumulated deficit of $317.9 million. Shareholders' equity at the balance sheet date is $40.5 million.

The convertible bonds and the funds held in escrow

In June 2024 the company issued convertible bonds with a principal amount of NIS 110 million, and in December 2025 it expanded the series by a further NIS 57.6 million through a private placement on the same terms. The conversion price is NIS 9.53 per share, and the interest rate was reduced from 6.5% to 4.35% effective 1 January 2026. The trustee is Mishmeret Trust Company Ltd.

The proceeds of both issuances were placed in an escrow account pledged in favour of the bondholders, with signature rights vested in the trustee alone. The funds are released to the company only upon satisfaction of a condition precedent, which section 7.2 of the deed of trust defines as an aggregate of three cumulative conditions:

SectionThe conditionPosition at 8.9.2026
7.2.1Winning a tender or contract to supply its products as the sole chip supplier for imaging radar — directly or through one of the international Tier 1 manufacturers — to one of ten vehicle manufacturers named in the deed: Volkswagen, Toyota, BYD, Stellantis, SAIC, Honda, Ford, Mercedes-Benz, General Motors, RenaultNo report of satisfaction
7.2.2Rolling average of Nasdaq closing prices over 30 consecutive trading days — not less than US$3.10US$0.7431
7.2.2Average aggregate trading volume on Nasdaq and Tel Aviv over those 30 days — at least 300,000 shares per day5,735,807 (20-day average)
7.2.3Nasdaq closing price on the date the documents are presented to the trustee — not less than US$3.10US$0.7431

The deadline for satisfying the conditions has been extended twice and currently stands at 31 December 2026. Section 7.3.2 requires the company to deliver to the trustee the tender particulars including expected volumes, and section 7.3.10 provides that if the confirmations are not delivered by the deadline, a mandatory full early redemption of principal, accrued interest and linkage differentials will be effected.

The financial covenants in the deed require shareholders' equity of not less than $5 million as at the last day of two consecutive quarters, and cash and deposits of not less than $5 million as at the last day of at least one quarter. At the balance sheet date the company complies with both — equity of $40.5 million and cash and deposits of $41.9 million.

The funds held in escrow (US$25,051 thousand) are a separate balance sheet line and are not included in total cash and deposits (US$41,918 thousand).

Liquidity and cash movement

Cash and deposits declined from $53.6 million at 31.3.2026 to $41.9 million at 30.6.2026. Net cash used in operating activities for the half was $20,568 thousand, against $17,998 thousand in the comparable half. Changes in working capital for the half totalled $(2,266) thousand — of which $(1,841) thousand arose in "accrued expenses and other payables", which fell from $2,950 to $1,109 thousand — against a positive contribution of $1,231 thousand in the comparable half.

US$ thousandsH1 2025H1 2026Q1 2026Q2 2026
Net cash used in operating activities — as reported(17,998)(20,568)(8,637)(11,931)
Of which: changes in working capital1,231(2,266)1,495(3,761)
Before changes in working capital(19,229)(18,302)(10,132)(8,170)

The separation of working capital movements was computed by us from the statement of cash flows and is not presented as such in the filing.

Note 1(e) to the interim statements states: "Based on its current operating plans, the Company believes that its existing cash and cash equivalents together with anticipated cash generated from operations will be sufficient to meet the Company's working capital requirements for at least one year from the date of the issuance of these condensed consolidated financial statements." The statements were issued on 3 September 2026. The auditor's report for 2025 contains no going-concern paragraph.

Cash and deposits by balance sheet date
US$ millions · excludes funds held in escrow
Operating cash — reported versus before working capital
US$ thousands · Source: statement of cash flows
4

Segments — Revenue Breakdown

Note 12 to the interim statements states that the company operates as a single operating and reportable segment and is managed on a consolidated basis, and that the chief operating decision maker is the Chief Executive Officer. The only disaggregation the company provides is by geography and by product type.

Revenue by geography — annual

US$ thousands2023%2024%2025%
Sweden24716.8%22429.2%74772.8%
United States14810.1%22028.6%20419.9%
China (excluding Hong Kong)63943.5%25433.1%60.6%
Hong Kong26618.1%——161.5%
Germany815.5%202.6%——
Israel503.4%506.5%535.2%
Other392.6%————
Total revenue1,470100%768100%1,026100%

China and Hong Kong together accounted for $905 thousand (61.6%) of 2023 revenue, fell to $254 thousand (33.1%) in 2024, and to $22 thousand (2.1%) in 2025.

Revenue by geography — half-year

US$ thousandsH1 2025%H1 2026%
Israel——46439.9%
China (excluding Hong Kong)——40034.3%
Sweden18057.3%19516.8%
United States11837.6%1059.0%
Hong Kong165.1%——
Total revenue314100%1,164100%

The $850 thousand increase in the half is fully explained, and more than fully, by two markets that recorded no revenue in the comparable half: Israel (+$464 thousand) and China (+$400 thousand). Sweden and the United States together moved from $298 thousand to $300 thousand.

By product mix in H1 2026: chipsets 74%, professional services 26%.

Customer concentration

PeriodCustomers above 10%Shares of total revenue
H1 2026437.8% · 34.4% · 16.8% · 9.0%
2025272.85% · 16.03%
2024419.5% · 18.4% · 16.9% · 14.5%
2023338.9% · 18.1% · 12.7%
From the financial statements, page F-18: "No other customer accounted for 10% or more of revenues in 2025, 2024 or 2023. The 10% customers were different customers in each of 2025, 2024 and 2023."

Remaining performance obligations stood at $290 thousand at 31.12.2024, $257 thousand at 31.12.2025, and $1,000 thousand at 30.6.2026 — unchanged from 31.3.2026.

Revenue by geography — three years
US$ thousands · Source: 20-F 2025, page F-18
Shares outstanding by date
Millions of shares · Source: 20-F and interim statements
5

Competitive Position

The only measurable parameter on which the solutions in this market can be compared directly is the number of virtual channels, which determines angular resolution and the rate of false alarms. The picture as presented in Arbe's annual report:

ParticipantVirtual channelsNote
Arbe — Phoenix2,304Up to 2 transmitters × 24 channels and up to 4 receivers × 12 channels
Mobileye1,536Initially announced 2,304 (48×48) and subsequently updated to 1,536 (32×48)
Forvia (Hella)57624×24 based on NXP chips
Texas Instruments / NXPup to 5764Rx×4Tx transceiver; 8Rx×8Tx samples scalable to 24×24
Conventional ADAS radar12Native resolution of 5 degrees or worse

Two further Chinese participants are named in the filing without channel figures: Huawei and Calterah.

The company's position, as set out in the annual report, rests on six arguments: the technology itself; competitive cost and power consumption; global coverage; interest from leading industry participants; automotive-grade development and production in joint work with Tier 1 suppliers since 2018; and relationships with multiple Tier 1 suppliers enabling market penetration.

The filing also states two structural features working against the company. First: Mobileye plans to play some of the roles of a Tier 1 supplier, thereby competing with Arbe's own customers. Second, arising from Arbe's position in the chain — as a Tier 2 supplier it does not control the adoption decision; that decision is taken by the vehicle manufacturer, through the Tier 1 supplier.

The industry timetable as the company describes it: mass-production programs for Level 3 and Level 4 consumer vehicles are targeted for 2028–2030, and the decisions on them are being taken in 2026–2027. Solutions that are to be candidates for those programs must pass automotive-grade manufacturing and audit processes with the OEMs and the Tier 1 suppliers.

6

How to Think About This Company

Arbe is not a company that is assessed on multiples. Annual revenue of about one million dollars against operating expenses of some 47 million is not a basis for computing a multiple — the ratio between them is 46 to one. Anyone who tries to measure it with the tools of an earning company is measuring noise. The questions that can be asked about it are questions of structure, of calendar, and of contractual thresholds.

First: what the revenue line is actually measuring. The filing states explicitly that the 10% customers were different customers in each of 2025, 2024 and 2023. The structural implication is that the revenue is not a recurring base but a sequence of projects, evaluations and engineering services. The same shows in the geography: China and Hong Kong were 61.6% of 2023 revenue and fell to 2.1% in 2025; Sweden rose to 72.8% in 2025 and in H1 2026 is 16.8%. The growth in the latest half is explained entirely by two markets that recorded no revenue a year earlier. The question is not what the growth rate is — it is whether the customers of 2026 will appear again in 2027.

Second: where the line falls between an accounting improvement and a cash improvement. Net loss for the half narrowed by $5.5 million, but 99.3% of the change originated outside operating activity — share-based compensation that has run down, and interest on the cash reserve. The measure unaffected by those items, Adjusted EBITDA, did not move at all: $(18.6) million in both halves. The same pattern repeats in the expense line: the 13.6% decline in operating expenses is almost entirely share-based compensation, and net of it cash expense rose by 1.4%. A reader of the headline alone sees a company cutting costs; a reader of the note sees a cost base that has yet to fall below the prior year.

Third: how to read the cash burn correctly. The reported line shows deterioration — $20.6 million in the half against $18.0 million. But $2.3 million of that movement is working capital, principally the "accrued expenses" line falling from $2.95 to $1.11 million. That is the settlement of a liability accrued in a prior period, not new spending. Net of working capital, the burn for the half was $18.3 million against $19.2 million, and at the quarterly level it fell from $10.1 million to $8.2 million. That distinction reverses the direction, and it is the reason the next report should be read before working capital movements rather than after them.

Fourth: what exactly sits in escrow, and to whom it belongs. The company raised two bond issuances, and the proceeds never reached its treasury. They sit in a pledged escrow account with signature rights vested in the trustee. The December 2025 raise of NIS 57.6 million added debt to the company but no usable cash. The free cash — $41.9 million — came entirely from equity issuances. That distinction changes how the balance sheet reads: total assets of $72.2 million include $25.1 million that cannot be used until a condition is satisfied.

Fifth: the three escrow conditions are cumulative, not alternative. The English summary in the 20-F presents them as a bullet list, which reads naturally as "one of several paths". The deed of trust itself, filed in Hebrew with the Israel Securities Authority, states expressly that the transfer is "conditioned on all three (3) of the following conditions being met", and section 7.2.1 ends with the word "and also". A commercial win, therefore, even if recognised as satisfying the first condition, is not sufficient on its own — the price condition stands separately. The volume condition, by contrast, is currently met by a wide margin.

Sixth: two fixed dates converge into a single quarter. On 13 April 2026 the company received a deficiency notice from Nasdaq for non-compliance with the $1.00 minimum bid price requirement, and the first cure period ends on 12 October 2026. The deadline for the escrow conditions is 31 December 2026. The two dates are not independent: the annual report states that a Nasdaq delisting may constitute an event permitting a demand for immediate repayment of the bonds. Until the end of 2026, therefore, the listing question is not solely a question of liquidity.

Seventh: what happens to the balance sheet after the fourth quarter. If the conditions are not satisfied and the mandatory redemption under section 7.3.10 is effected, the escrow funds will be applied to repay the bonds and the company will be required to add interest and linkage differentials from its own resources. The other side of that same event is that from 1 January 2027 the company is left with no financial debt: the deed's restrictions on charges, additional debt and distributions lapse, the covenants fall away, and the link between the Nasdaq listing question and the balance sheet is severed. One event, two opposite meanings.

Eighth: what the 8 September announcement says, and what it does not. It reported that one of the world's largest automotive groups selected a HiRain system based on Arbe's chipset for a Level 3 automated driving program in China, across multiple brands, with series-production deliveries from the fourth quarter of 2027. This is the first time a production program with a date, rather than an evaluation or a tender process, has been reported. What was not disclosed: the manufacturer's identity, the number of brands, unit volumes, contract value, and whether Arbe is a sole supplier. The last three of those are precisely what sections 7.2.1 and 7.3.2 of the deed of trust require.

Ninth: the capital structure and who holds it. The company has no controlling shareholder. The board and management hold 10.02%, and the two largest holders — hedge funds that entered through structured offerings — are each capped at 9.99%. There is no strategic investor, vehicle manufacturer or Tier 1 supplier in the ownership table. In parallel, the share count rose from 77.9 million at the end of 2023 to approximately 127.3 million, with a further 43.5 million dilutive instruments outstanding — 33.8% of the existing capital.

The frame in one line. Arbe is a company in which a substantial part of the value turns on contractual and regulatory tests whose dates are known, rather than on lines in an income statement. The share price itself is an input to both of those tests — to the US$3.10 threshold in the deed of trust and to Nasdaq's dollar requirement alike. An analytical frame that ignores that feature will measure the wrong thing.

7

Risks & Monitoring

Fixed dates

DateWhat closes on itPosition at 8.9.2026
12.10.2026End of Nasdaq's first cure period (180 days from the deficiency notice of 13.4.2026). Ten consecutive trading days at a closing bid of at least US$1.00 are required. Failure leads to consideration of a second period, conditional on meeting the other listing standards and giving notice of an intention to cureClosing price US$0.7431
31.12.2026Deadline for satisfying the three escrow release conditions. Failure to deliver the confirmations triggers a mandatory full early redemption under section 7.3.10No report of satisfaction
Q4 2027Start of series-production deliveries in the L3 program with HiRain, per the company's announcement of 8.9.2026—

Matters under monitoring

  • Concentration and customer turnover — no customer accounting for more than 10% of revenue recurred across the three years 2023–2025. This figure is disclosed only in the notes to the annual report.
  • The gap between reported expense and cash expense — according to company management, the full effect of the cost reduction is expected to appear in the third quarter of 2026.
  • The relationship between guidance and run-rate — on 6.8.2026 the company reaffirmed guidance of revenue in the range of $4–6 million and an adjusted EBITDA loss of $28–31 million for 2026. Revenue in the first half was $1.16 million, and the contracted backlog at 30.6.2026 stood at $1.0 million.
  • Single manufacturing supplier dependency — note 1(d): the company depends on one supplier for the development and productization of its products.
  • Position in the chain — as a Tier 2 supplier, revenue passes through Tier 1 suppliers and the adoption decision belongs to the vehicle manufacturer. The company has stated that it is no longer providing guidance on the timing of future OEM design wins, given adoption cycles longer than previously anticipated.
  • Geographic exposure — 34.3% of half-year revenue originated in China, against the backdrop of United States–China tariff and trade policy. 135 of 145 employees are based in Israel; the notes address the effects of hostilities, reserve call-ups and ceasefire violations.
  • Management turnover — the CEO was replaced (Kobi Marenko moved to the role of President, Ram Machness was appointed CEO); the CFO gave notice in June 2026 and a successor took office on 30.8.2026.
  • Dilution — 43,496,008 dilutive instruments at 30.6.2026 (convertible bonds 9,265,580; warrants 26,268,168; options and restricted stock units 7,962,260), against approximately 128.6 million shares.
  • Reverse share split — the agenda of the general meeting convened for 2.9.2026 included authorising the board to effect a reverse share split at a ratio to be determined. The voting results had not been located as at the date of this review.
8

Scenario Framework

The scenarios below are descriptive, not predictive. They contain no prices, no probabilities, and no ranking between outcomes. Their sole purpose is to organise the conditions that would need to hold for each state to materialise, so that they can be tested against subsequent filings.

Scenarios are descriptive, not predictive.

Conditions for positive convergence
If the following hold in parallel
  • If quarterly revenue rises above $1.5 million while the contracted backlog grows rather than depletes
  • If the 10% customers of 2026 appear again in the 2027 concentration note
  • If cash operating expense falls below $8 million per quarter and stays there
  • If gross margin turns positive for the first time
  • If the L3 program with HiRain reaches series-production deliveries on the timetable the company stated
  • If further agreements are signed in the defense channel, where the sales cycle is shorter
Conditions for continuity
If the picture remains as it is
  • If revenue continues to run at around one million dollars a year, from rotating customers
  • If Adjusted EBITDA remains around $(18) million per half
  • If cash expense settles around $8–9 million per quarter
  • If the escrow conditions are not satisfied and the mandatory redemption is effected — leaving the company with no financial debt and no covenants, and equally without the escrow funds
  • If the Nasdaq listing question is resolved through a second cure period or a reverse share split
Conditions for deterioration
If the following hold
  • If cash expense does not fall in the third quarter, notwithstanding management's statement
  • If second-half revenue does not approach the guided range and guidance is revised
  • If cash and deposits fall below $33 million before year end
  • If a further equity raise is required at a price below the current one, on top of potential dilution of 33.8%
  • If the shares are delisted from Nasdaq while the bonds remain outstanding — an event which, per the filing, may give rise to a demand for immediate repayment
  • If the customers of the half do not appear again in the following year, as occurred in each of the three preceding years
9

Analytical Lens

The six questions below are identical in every company review we publish. They are deliberately open, and do not lead to a single conclusion. Their purpose is to let the reader examine the company along the same six dimensions on which every other company is examined.

๐Ÿ“ˆ
Growth
What is the source of growth in the revenue line, and does it recur? For Arbe: half-year revenue grew 3.7-fold, and all of the increase came from two markets that recorded no revenue in the comparable half.
๐Ÿ’ฐ
Profitability
What is the gap between the reported line and the cash line, and what produces it? Here: a net loss down 22.8%, an Adjusted EBITDA that did not move, and cash operating expense up 1.4%.
โš–๏ธ
Leverage
What is the debt structure, and when does it fall due? Here: $24.0 million of bonds classified as current, against a pledged escrow account of $25.1 million outside the company's control, with a decision date of 31.12.2026.
๐Ÿ›ก๏ธ
Competitive position
What is the differentiation, and has it been converted into revenue? Here: 2,304 virtual channels against 1,536 for the next participant, alongside cumulative revenue of approximately $3.3 million across the three years 2023–2025.
๐Ÿ‘”
Management quality
How does management's communication address the gap between statement and figure? Here: an "approximately 15%" reduction that appears in the reported line but not in cash expense, alongside an explicit withdrawal of guidance on the timing of future design wins.
๐Ÿ”
Business complexity and risk
Which factors external to the company determine the outcome? Here: a decision by a vehicle manufacturer that is not a direct customer, a share price test in a deed of trust, an exchange listing requirement, and a single manufacturing supplier.
10

Key Observations

1. Revenue in 2025 ($1,026 thousand) was lower than in 2023 ($1,470 thousand), while operating expenses ranged between $46.8 and $48.9 million in each of the three years. The financial statements note that the customers accounting for more than 10% of revenue were different customers in each of 2023, 2024 and 2025.

2. Net loss for H1 2026 narrowed by $5,460 thousand against the comparable half, and 99.3% of the change originated outside operating activity. Adjusted EBITDA was $(18,622) thousand against $(18,637) thousand. Reported operating expenses fell 13.6%, and net of share-based compensation cash expense rose 1.4%; sequentially within 2026 it fell 11.6% between the quarters.

3. The proceeds of both convertible bond issuances were placed in an escrow account pledged in favour of the holders and were not transferred to the company. Their release is conditioned on three cumulative conditions under section 7.2 of the deed of trust, among them a 30-trading-day rolling average price of at least US$3.10. The closing price on 8.9.2026 was US$0.7431. The deadline for satisfying the conditions is 31.12.2026, and failure triggers a mandatory full early redemption.

4. On 8.9.2026 Arbe and HiRain reported that one of the world's largest automotive groups had selected a radar system based on Arbe's chipset for a Level 3 automated driving program in China, across multiple brands, with series-production deliveries from the fourth quarter of 2027. The announcement does not identify the vehicle manufacturer, states no volumes or contract value, and contains no reference to sole-supplier status.

Operating framework and regulatory disclosure

Bakshi Finance operates as a Family Office serving qualified clients only. Mr Yaron Bakshi held a licensed investment advisory licence between 2008 and 2023. As at the date of publication of this document, the firm does not hold an investment advice, investment marketing or portfolio management licence.

This document is intended for research and professional study purposes only. Nothing herein constitutes a recommendation to buy, sell, hold or take any action in securities. Nothing herein substitutes for advice that takes account of the particular circumstances and needs of any individual. Every decision rests with the investor alone.

The data were drawn from official sources: Arbe Robotics' annual report on Form 20-F for 2025 (filed 27.3.2026, KPMG Somekh Chaikin), the interim financial statements as at 30.6.2026 (furnished 3.9.2026), ten current reports on Form 6-K through 8.9.2026, and the Series A convertible bond prospectus together with its annexed deed of trust. Market data as at 8.9.2026. Subsequent filings may change the picture. Past performance is not indicative of future results. This site takes no part in the investment decision. The decision belongs to the client.

๐Ÿ”’

Qualified Investor Review โ€” Family Office

The full analytical review of Arbe Robotics (ARBE) for Q2 2026 is available to Bakshi Finance premium clients.
The review comprises 10 sections, the "How to Think About This Company" narrative, a structured scenario framework, and a 6-dimension Analytical Lens.

Get access to the review Educational content only ยท Not investment advice ยท See disclosure