Technology · Cambridge, UK · NASDAQ
| Item | FY-4 | FY-3 | FY-2 | FY-1 | FY (latest) | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.7B | $2.7B | $3.2B | $4.0B | [ARM 10-K] | |
| Gross Profit | $2.6B | $2.6B | $3.1B | $3.9B | [ARM 10-K] | |
| Operating Income | $680.0M | $678.0M | $117.0M | $831.0M | [ARM 10-K] | |
| Operating Margin % | 25.2% | 25.3% | 3.6% | 20.7% | [ARM 10-K] | |
| EBITDA | $771.0M | $900.0M | $305.0M | $1.3B | [ARM 10-K] | |
| Net Income | $549.0M | $524.0M | $306.0M | $792.0M | [ARM 10-K] | |
| EPS ($) | $0.54 | $0.51 | $0.29 | $0.61 | [ARM 10-K] | |
| FCF | $383.0M | $646.0M | $947.0M | $158.0M | [ARM 10-K] |
| Multiple | Company | Self-Average 5Y | Gap vs 5Y Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E (TTM) [yfinance snapshot · 5Y computed 2026-04-18] | 222.3x | 303.0x (2Y) | -26.6% |
| P/E (Fwd) [yfinance forward consensus] | 77.8x | N/A | N/A |
| EV/EBITDA [yfinance snapshot · 5Y computed 2026-04-18] | 160.5x | 88.2x (2Y) | +82.0% |
| P/S [yfinance snapshot · 5Y computed 2026-04-18] | 37.9x | 34.2x (2Y) | +10.9% |
| P/B [yfinance snapshot · 5Y computed 2026-04-18] | 22.7x | 20.5x (2Y) | +10.6% |
| Div Yield [yfinance snapshot · 5Y computed 2026-04-18] | 0.00% | N/A | N/A |
| FCF Yield (snapshot) [computed · 2026-04-18] | 0.09% | 0.43% (2Y) | -79.1% |
5Y statistical averages are computed from yfinance annual data (income_stmt × balance_sheet × cash_flow + price snapshots at FY-end). Source: lib/compute_5y_multiples.py · Refresh: 2026-04-18 | |||
A full How to Think About This Company analysis for ARM — covering the essence of the business, the key variables, potential analytical pitfalls, and what distinguishes professional thinking from noise — is available within Family Office content.
The difference between surface-level analysis and professional thinking often lies in the variables that are not immediately visible.
The framework below describes which conditions need to hold in each scenario — not a price forecast.
Scenarios are descriptive, not predictive. They outline possible conditions, not expected outcomes. There is no probability assessment in these scenarios, no preferred direction, and no expectation as to which one will materialize.
In professional company analysis, the question is not "is it good", but "from which angles must the company be examined so that the essential is not missed". Every analysis at Bakshi Finance passes through six lenses. The text below is not a verdict — it is the mapping of the questions this analysis is meant to answer.
The analysis is based on an internal multi-factor analytical framework used in professional portfolio management. The framework maps the questions; the answers appear woven through the analysis above.
What this lens is not: there is no rating here, no score, no comparison between this company and another, and no preference. The same six questions are asked of every company on the site — the variation is in the answers, not in the tool.
This framework is intended to structure analysis, not to produce an investment conclusion.
This summary is not a recommendation. It is a factual list of what the analysis identified. The decision belongs to the client.
Disclosure — Family Office Format
Bakshi Finance operates as a Family Office serving qualified investors only. Mr. Yaron Bakshi held a licensed investment adviser registration in Israel from 2008 to 2023. As of the date of publication of this document, the firm does not hold a licence for investment advice, investment marketing, or portfolio management.
This document is intended for research and professional educational purposes only. Nothing herein constitutes a recommendation to buy, sell, hold, or undertake any action in any security. It is not a substitute for advice that takes into account the personal circumstances and needs of any individual. Any decision rests solely with the investor.
Past performance is not indicative of future results.