NVIDIA Corporation

Analytical Review · Second Quarter Fiscal 2027 (quarter ended 26 July 2026)

Bakshi Finance — Family Office | Research Depth: Comprehensive

NVDA
Compliance · Nasdaq 100
Revenue — Quarter
$96,221M
vs $46,743M prior-year quarter · ‎+105.9%
Gross Margin
75.0%
vs 72.4% prior-year quarter
Operating Income — Quarter
$63,734M
Operating margin 66.24%
Operating Cash Flow
$24,077M
vs $50,344M prior quarter
Days Sales Outstanding
60
vs 45 prior quarter · per company guidance
Data Center — Quarter
$89,023M
92.5% of revenue · ‎+117% YoY

What this review rests on. NVIDIA Corporation's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended 26 July 2026, filed with the SEC on 26 August 2026 (accession 0001045810-26-000075); the Form 8-K and Exhibits 99.1 and 99.2 dated 26 August 2026; and the Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended 25 January 2026. Every figure on this page is drawn from one of those documents. Where a figure has been calculated by us, that is stated explicitly. Market data is as of the close of trading on 28 August 2026.

1

Company Profile

NVIDIA Corporation designs graphics processors, networking processors and complete systems for accelerated computing infrastructure, and supplies the software layer that runs them. The company trades on Nasdaq under SEC registration 0001045810, and its fiscal year ends in late January.

Operations are reported in two segments: Compute & Networking, which was 91.8% of quarterly revenue, and Graphics. Cut by market platform, Data Center was $89,023M — 92.5% of total revenue for the quarter.

The products named in the filing are the Blackwell Ultra architecture, which management describes as "the vast majority of our revenue", and the Vera Rubin platform, which management describes as being in "full production" with racks running at CoreWeave, Google Cloud, Microsoft Azure, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure and Nebius. Alongside them the filing names Spectrum-6 switch systems, the NVIDIA Vera CPU, the Groq 3 LPX inference accelerator, and the DSX platform.

The filing divides customers into direct customers — add-in board makers, distributors, ODMs, OEMs, cloud service providers, AI model makers and system integrators — and indirect customers who purchase through them. In the second quarter of fiscal 2027, one direct customer was 16% of revenue; for the half, three customers were 16%, 15% and 13%.

2

Financial Performance

Revenue for the quarter was $96,221M, against $46,743M in the prior-year quarter — up 105.9% — and against $81,615M in the prior quarter, up 17.9%.

$ millionsQ2 FY2027Q1 FY2027Q2 FY2026H1 FY2027H1 FY2026
Revenue96,22181,61546,743177,83790,805
Gross profit72,14261,15733,853133,29960,521
Gross margin75.0%74.9%72.4%75.0%66.6%
Research and development7,0546,3214,29113,3758,280
Total operating expenses8,4087,6215,41316,02910,443
Operating income63,73453,53628,440117,27050,078
Operating margin66.24%65.60%60.84%65.94%55.15%
Other income, net7,77316,3672,76624,1403,039
Net income59,68858,32126,422118,01045,197
Diluted earnings per share$2.46$2.39$1.08$4.85$1.84

Two notes govern how this table should be read.

First — the comparison base. The prior-year half's gross margin of 66.6% is depressed by a one-time charge of $4.5 billion for H20 inventory and purchase obligations, recorded in the first quarter of fiscal 2026 following US export controls on China. The current quarter recorded a release of $180M from that same provision. Comparing 75.0% to 66.6% is not a comparison of two operating periods.

Second — GAAP net income exceeds non-GAAP net income. $59,688M against $53,954M. The relationship is normally the other way round. The difference is almost entirely mark-to-market gains on the equity investment portfolio: $7,771M in the quarter and $23,707M in the half, which is 16.76% of first-half pre-tax income. Management itself excludes this line from non-GAAP results.

Quarterly Revenue
Last five quarters
Gross and Operating Margin
Percent, GAAP basis
3

Balance Sheet & Capital

The gap between earnings and cash is the most prominent figure in the filing. Net income for the quarter was $59,688M; cash from operating activities was $24,077M. A ratio of 40.3%, against 86.3% in the prior quarter and 94.7% in the prior-year half.

$ millionsQ2 FY2027Q1 FY2027Q2 FY2026
Net income59,68858,32126,422
Operating cash flow24,07750,34415,365
Cash flow as a share of net income40.3%86.3%58.2%
Free cash flow21,34148,55413,450

The source of the gap is working capital, which consumed $30,707M in a single quarter. The largest line is receivables: $22,346M.

Days sales outstanding — what the company says

"Accounts receivable was $63.1 billion with 60 days sales outstanding (DSO), up from 45 days sequentially, due to extended payment terms on large, multi-quarter agreements with certain investment-grade customers."

Note 7 to the quarterly filing quantifies the policy: for investment-grade customer purchases, the company has provided and may in future provide longer payment terms ranging from 90 days up to one year, to assist customers with large data centre builds.

The balance sheet — the material movements

$ millions26 Jul 202625 Jan 2026Change
Cash and marketable debt securities56,58649,670+13.9%
Marketable equity securities42,78312,886+232.0%
Non-marketable securities51,15722,251+129.9%
Accounts receivable, net63,05938,466+63.9%
Inventories31,57521,403+47.5%
Total assets320,272206,803+54.9%
Total debt33,3668,468+294.0%
Shareholders' equity228,984157,293+45.6%

In June 2026 the company issued $25.0 billion of senior unsecured notes across seven tranches for general corporate purposes, while holding $56.6 billion in cash and marketable debt securities. The inventory mix shifted materially: raw materials rose from $3,807M to $11,341M, while finished goods fell from $8,774M to $6,857M.

Net Income vs Operating Cash Flow
The gap between the lines
Revenue by Market Platform
$ millions
4

Segments

$ millionsQ2 FY2027Q1 FY2027Q2 FY2026YoY
Data Center89,02375,24641,096+117%
— Hyperscale48,71043,05024,168+102%
— AI Clouds, Industrial & Enterprise40,31332,19616,928+138%
Edge Computing7,1986,3695,647+27%

The fastest-growing category is not hyperscale but AI Clouds, Industrial & Enterprise — 138% year on year and 25% sequentially. Management attributes this to demand from AI natives, enterprises, sovereign customers, and hyperscalers using AI clouds.

Methodological note: during the second quarter a company was reclassified from AI Clouds, Industrial & Enterprise to Hyperscale, and the comparable prior-period revenue was recast.

Geographic breakdown — by direct customer headquarters

$ millionsQ2 FY2027ShareQ2 FY2026H1 FY2027H1 FY2026
United States60,07462.4%32,897123,84358,582
Taiwan26,98528.0%8,90238,99116,550
China including Hong Kong7,8808.2%3,98512,43013,644
Other1,2821.3%9592,5732,029

The split is determined by the direct customer's headquarters location, not by the end destination. Taiwan grew 3.03-fold in a year — this is the headquarters location of the ODMs, not an end market. China fell over the half from $13,644M to $12,430M, and management notes that shipments of Data Center Hopper products to China were less than 1% of Data Center revenue in the quarter.

Concentration

PeriodRevenue concentrationReceivables concentration
Q2 FY2027One direct customer — 16%Five customers — 22%, 14%, 13%, 11%, 10% = 70%
H1 FY2027Three customers — 16%, 15%, 13% = 44%
Q2 FY2026Two customers — 23%, 16% = 39%—
25 Jan 2026Full year: two — 22%, 14% = 36%Three — 25%, 18%, 13% = 56%

The two concentrations move in opposite directions. Revenue concentration fell from 39% across two customers to 16% for a single customer. Receivables concentration rose from 56% across three to 70% across five.

Receivables, Inventory and Debt
Balance sheet, 25 Jan 2026 vs 26 Jul 2026
Future Commitments by Fiscal Year
$ billions, Note 10
5

Competitive Position

The filing supports the company's position on three measurable layers.

The first layer — share of a single end market. Data Center is 92.5% of quarterly revenue, and the Compute & Networking segment is 91.8%. That is a very high concentration in one market, which is simultaneously a strength and an exposure.

The second layer — research intensity. Research and development spending was $7,054M, or 7.33% of revenue, against 9.18% in the prior-year quarter. The absolute figure grew 64% year on year while revenue grew 106%. A low ratio of research spending to revenue, alongside a 66.24% operating margin, is generally a marker of a strong position — the company does not need to spend proportionally much to hold its place.

The third layer, and it is the new one — financing and guarantees. The filing describes a structure in which the company helps customers secure land, power and shell capacity for data centres. Management sets out the reasoning:

"AI clouds and model makers are seeing extraordinary demand for AI infrastructure, yet many are growing faster than their balance sheets and long-term credit profiles can support. In response, we have entered into arrangements that help select customers secure the land, power and data center capacity needed to support their growth."

Within that structure, agreements were signed under which the company earns revenue on the upfront sale of its infrastructure and, if certain criteria are met, also participates in revenue share generated by the AI clouds from their own third-party customers.

Alongside these, as of 26 July 2026 the company held $3.3 billion of investments in infrastructure financiers accounted for using the equity method. Those investments deemed to be variable interest entities carried a maximum loss exposure of $4.7 billion. The company determined it is not the primary beneficiary and therefore does not consolidate them.

6

How to Think About This Company

This quarter poses one question, and it is not about the size of demand. Demand is clear: $96.2 billion of revenue growing 106%, and management guidance of $108.0 billion for the coming quarter. The question is who pays, when, and on what terms.

A reader who looks only at the revenue line sees the strongest quarter in the history of the semiconductor industry. A reader who also opens the cash flow statement sees a second picture laid over the first: operating cash flow fell from $50,344M to $24,077M — down 52% — in the same quarter that revenue rose 17.9%. Both lines describe the same three months.

The explanation is not mysterious, and the company gives it itself: days sales outstanding rose from 45 to 60. In absolute terms, receivables grew from $38,466M to $63,059M. Put differently, nearly $24 billion of sales booked as revenue has not yet been collected in cash. Note 7 adds that terms can extend to a full year.

Here the distinction that matters enters. There are two possible readings of the same fact, and the filing does not settle between them. The first reading: a company whose demand exceeds supply chooses to use its strong balance sheet to accelerate the pace of customer deployment. That is a sound use of capital, and days outstanding will settle once the cycle matures. The second reading: customers could not have bought at this pace on ordinary terms, and the financing is part of the price of the sale. Under that reading, part of the growth was purchased rather than simply sold.

What makes the question material is that it does not stand alone. Over the same period, receivables concentration deepened — five customers are now 70% of the gross balance, against three at 56% at year end. The extended credit and the heavy concentration sit on the same names.

And the layer above them sits off the balance sheet. Supply and capacity commitments jumped from $119 billion to $279 billion in a single quarter, "primarily related to the procurement of memory" per management. Total future commitments are $366 billion, plus a further $56 billion of additional commitments. Above those sit guarantees with maximum gross exposure of $108.5 billion, of which $105 billion guarantees a single customer's 20-year lease obligations. The total, roughly $530 billion, is 2.32 times the company's shareholders' equity.

None of these figures indicates operating weakness. Gross margin expanded 2.6 points year on year. Operating margin is 66.24%. Stock-based compensation is only 2.11% of revenue — very low. The diluted share count fell 1.01% over the year. $45.3 billion was returned to shareholders in the half. These are the markers of a very strong company.

The inventory build, which looks worrying at first glance at +47.5%, also resolves in the company's favour once the mix is examined: raw materials nearly tripled while finished goods fell 21.8%. That is the signature of stocking ahead of a launch, not of goods that will not sell. Inventory provisions in fact halved year on year.

And in the same spirit of fairness, the concerns are not proven either. The filing does not disclose which holdings produced the $23.7 billion of mark-to-market gains in the half, and contains no related-party note — neither in the quarterly filing nor in the annual one. Whether the companies NVIDIA invests in are the same companies that buy from it cannot be tested from the filing. The absence of a related-party note, alongside the existence of equity-method holdings, is the best available evidence that the overlap sits below the materiality threshold — but it is not proof.

Finally, two details in the outlook that are easy to miss. The first: according to company guidance, gross margin next quarter will be 74.0% rather than 75.0% — a full point lower, which the release does not explain. The second: the outlook assumes no Data Center compute revenue from China at all. Anyone treating China as a risk should note that it has already been removed from the number.

What this quarter changes is not the size of the business but its shape. A company that collects cash on time and a company that extends credit, guarantees and equity investment to the same customer base are two different companies in risk terms, even when they sell exactly the same product at exactly the same pace. The next filing, in November 2026, contains the line that will settle it: days sales outstanding.
7

Risks & Monitoring

Items under watch

8

Scenario Framework

The framework below describes conditions, not forecasts. It contains no prices, no probabilities, and no preference between the states. Its purpose is to identify which observable variables in future filings could move the company from one state to another.

Scenarios are descriptive, not predictive.

CONDITION SET A
The credit extension was cyclical
Conditions that would need to hold:
  • Days sales outstanding return to the 45–50 range
  • Operating cash flow returns above 70% of net income
  • Receivables grow more slowly than revenue
  • No material allowance for doubtful accounts appears
CONDITION SET B
The credit extension became structural
Conditions that would need to hold:
  • Days sales outstanding remain near 60 next quarter
  • Receivables concentration stays above 65%
  • Supply commitments remain above $250 billion
  • Guarantees are neither called nor reduced
CONDITION SET C
The credit extension becomes credit risk
Conditions that would need to hold:
  • Days sales outstanding rise above 70
  • A material allowance for doubtful accounts appears
  • A guarantee is called, or unconsolidated-entity exposure grows
  • The $279 billion supply commitment stands against softening demand
9

Analytical Lens

Six open questions, identical across every review. They have no single correct answer and they do not lead to a conclusion. Their purpose is to build the frame within which the reader forms their own view.

This framework is intended to structure analysis, not to produce an investment conclusion.

📈
Growth
Is a 105.9% growth rate repeatable on a base twice the size, and how much of it rests on customers the company is helping to finance?
💰
Profitability
A 66.24% operating margin is exceptional in any industry. What would cause it to fall, and what does management say about the guided step down to a 74.0% gross margin?
⚖️
Leverage
Debt rose from $8,468M to $33,366M in the quarter. What do $366B of commitments and $108.5B of guarantees mean against shareholders’ equity of $228,984M?
🏰
Competitive Position
Does the competitive position rest on the product alone, or also on the company’s capacity to finance and guarantee its customers?
👤
Management Quality
The company raised $25B of debt against $56.6B of cash and purchased $42.4B of equity securities in the half. What picture does that draw of priorities?
🧩
Complexity & Risk
Operating cash flow was 40.3% of net income, against 94.7% in the prior-year half. Which part of that is cyclical and which is structural?
10

Key Observations

  1. Revenue for the quarter was $96,221M, up 105.9% year on year and 17.9% sequentially. Gross margin was 75.0%, operating margin 66.24%, and Data Center revenue was $89,023M, or 92.5% of the total.
  2. Operating cash flow was $24,077M against net income of $59,688M — a ratio of 40.3%, against 94.7% in the prior-year half. Free cash flow fell from $48,554M to $21,341M in the same quarter that revenue rose 17.9%. Working capital consumed $30,707M, of which $22,346M was receivables.
  3. Receivables rose from $38,466M to $63,059M, and days sales outstanding from 45 to 60 per company disclosure. Five direct customers now represent 70% of the gross receivables balance, against three representing 56% at the end of fiscal 2026.
  4. Off-balance-sheet obligations total approximately $530.5 billion — 2.32 times shareholders' equity of $228,984M. That comprises $366 billion of future commitments, within which supply and capacity commitments jumped from $119 billion to $279 billion in a single quarter; $56 billion of additional commitments; and $108.5 billion of guarantees, of which $105 billion covers a single customer's 20-year leases.
Operating Framework and Regulatory Disclosure

Bakshi Finance operates as a Family Office serving qualified clients only. Mr. Yaron Bakshi held a licensed investment advisory registration from 2008 to 2023. As of the date of this document, the firm does not hold an investment advisory, investment marketing, or portfolio management licence.

This document is prepared for research and professional study purposes only. Nothing herein constitutes a recommendation to buy, sell, hold, or take any action in any security. Nothing herein substitutes for advice tailored to the circumstances and needs of any individual. Every decision rests with the investor alone.

All figures are drawn from official primary sources only: NVIDIA Corporation's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended 26 July 2026, filed with the SEC on 26 August 2026 (accession 0001045810-26-000075); the Form 8-K and Exhibits 99.1 and 99.2 dated 26 August 2026; and the Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended 25 January 2026. Market data as of the close of trading on 28 August 2026. Subsequent filings may change the picture. Past performance is not indicative of future results. This site does not participate in the investment decision. The decision belongs to the client.