עב
Bakshi Finance — Family Office
The information presented on this site is provided for informational and educational purposes only. It does not constitute investment advice, investment marketing, or a substitute for personalised advice. The firm operates as a Family Office serving qualified investors. The firm's founder held a licensed investment-advisory practice from 2008 through 2023. This site does not participate in the investment decision.

ServiceNow, Inc.

Enterprise AI Platform for Workflow Automation | NYSE

Data as of: April 2026 | Primary source: 10-K FY2025 (filed January 28, 2026)

NOW
Research Depth · Extended Technology · Enterprise Software
Revenue FY2025
$13.28B
+20.9% YoY
Subscription Revenue
$12.88B
97% of total revenue
Free Cash Flow
$4.6B
35% FCF margin
RPO
$28.2B
+27% YoY · cRPO ~$13B
Customers >$5M ACV
603
+20.1% YoY (FY24: 502)
Renewal Rate
98%
Stable for 3+ years
Non-GAAP Op Margin
31.2%
FY24: 29.6% · FY23: 27.7%
Analytical Framework
6D
Six-dimensional review
Market Cap
$94.0B
StockAnalysis · 27/04/2026
P/E (TTM)
54.3
StockAnalysis
EV/EBITDA
30.7
TTM · StockAnalysis
Net Debt
-$5.48B
Net cash position · 10-K FY25
Gross Margin
76.6%
TTM · StockAnalysis
1 Company Profile

ServiceNow is an enterprise software company headquartered in Santa Clara, California. The single core product is the ServiceNow AI Platform (formerly Now Platform) — a cloud-based SaaS platform that orchestrates workflows across departments, automates them, and now embeds AI agents with human-in-the-loop governance. The platform sits above the ERP, CRM, and HR systems — it does not replace them; it controls the flow of work between them.

Revenue model: 97% subscription, 3% professional services. ~8,700 enterprise customers, 603 paying over $5M ACV. RPO of $28.2B is 2.1× annual revenue — meaning future contractual revenue already exceeds two years of run-rate. Listed on NYSE (5-for-1 split effective Dec 17, 2025). 29,187 employees worldwide, ~50/50 US/international split.

2 Financial Performance — 3 Years
MetricFY2025FY2024FY2023
Total Revenue$13,278M$10,984M$8,971M
Subscription Revenue$12,883M$10,646M$8,680M
YoY Growth+20.9%+22.4%
GAAP Operating Margin13.7%12.4%8.5%
Non-GAAP Operating Margin31.2%29.6%27.7%
Free Cash Flow$4,636M$3,455M$2,728M
Diluted EPS (GAAP)$1.67$1.37$1.68*
SBC (% of Revenue)14.7%15.9%17.9%

* FY23 includes a $723M one-time tax benefit (release of valuation allowance).

3 Balance Sheet & Capital Allocation
Item12/31/202512/31/2024
Total Liquidity (Cash + Securities)$10.06B$9.87B
Long-term Debt (2030 Notes)$1.49B$1.49B
Deferred Revenue (total)$8.43B$6.91B
Goodwill (post Moveworks)$3.58B$1.27B
Stockholders' Equity$12.96B$9.61B
FY2025 Buybacks$1.84B (10.3M shares)
Buyback Authorization (Jan 2026)+$5.0B added
4 Customers & M&A Activity

Customer concentration is low. No customer represents over 10% of revenue. Customer base diversified across ~8,700 enterprises, with 603 paying over $5M ACV (+20.1% YoY).

Geographic split FY2025: North America 62.9% ($8.35B, of which ~94% US), EMEA 25.6% ($3.40B), APAC 11.5% ($1.53B).

2025 M&A — exceptionally active:

  • Moveworks (closed Dec 15, 2025): $2.41B — enterprise search + virtual agents
  • Logik.io (closed May 30, 2025): $506M — AI CPQ
  • data.world (July 2025): not material — data cataloging
  • Veza Technologies (signed Dec 2025, closing H1 2026): ~$1.25B cash — access management
  • Armis Security (signed Dec 2025, closing H2 2026): ~$7.75B cash — cyber-physical security. Additional debt financing planned.
5 Analytical Lens — The Questions We Ask
In professional company analysis, the question is not "is this good?" but rather "through which lenses must this company be examined so that we do not miss what matters most?" At Bakshi Finance, every analysis passes through six lenses.

This framework is intended to structure analysis, not to produce an investment conclusion.
Growth
Revenue growth +20.9% — does it stem from quantity, price, or mix? Is cRPO holding above 20%?
Profitability
Non-GAAP Op Margin 31.2% — has it stabilised? Subscription gross margin dropped from 82% to 80% — direction?
Leverage
Capital structure: $10B liquidity vs $1.5B long-term debt. Will Armis ($7.75B) reshape leverage?
Competitive Position
Microsoft Copilot Studio + Salesforce Agentforce — competitive bundling vs. NOW's irreplaceability?
Management Quality
5 acquisitions integrating in parallel — execution risk or capability?
Business Complexity
Public sector exposure (DOJ investigation referenced in Note 18). Consumption-based AI pricing.
6 Scenario Framework
Scenarios are descriptive, not predictive. They outline possible conditions, not expected outcomes.
These scenarios carry no probability assessment, no preferred direction, and no expectation regarding which, if any, will materialise.
Constructive Scenario — if the following conditions hold:

cRPO growth holds above 20-25% for 4+ quarters; Now Assist + AI agents drive over-the-top ARR via Pro Plus migration; Moveworks integration successful; Armis & Veza close on schedule; subscription gross margin stabilises above 80%.

Base Scenario — if current trends continue:

Renewal rate 97-98%; cRPO growth 18-22% YoY; FCF margin 33-36%; M&A integrations without major surprises; Microsoft & Salesforce compete at the margin of new growth but not core base.

Adverse Scenario — if the following risks materialise:

cRPO growth drops below 15% for 2-3 quarters; Microsoft Copilot Studio wins material enterprise RFPs that were previously NOW's; subscription gross margin erodes below 80%; Armis impairment or material delay; DOJ investigation results in federal contract restrictions.

Scenarios describe conditions, not forecasts. There is no preferred direction and no probability assessment expressed in this framework.
7 How to Think About This Company
ServiceNow is not a software company in the classic sense — it is enterprise infrastructure. Its product is not an application competing for a specific slot in the stack; it is a workflow management layer that sits above ERP, CRM, and HRIS, replacing manual coordination and approval. This makes the analysis different from "how many licenses will they sell next year" — the question is how much breadth they capture in the organisation, and at what speed.
The thesis core: Renewal rate of 98%, cRPO growth +25%, FCF margin of 35%. All three derive from the same source: high switching costs in enterprise. When ServiceNow becomes the workflow backbone of an organisation, every department builds on top of it, AI agents are trained on its data, and integration partners (Accenture, Deloitte) embed it in every project. Replacement requires dismantling a tree of processes built over years.
Where the analysis may go wrong — first error: comparing to other CRM/SaaS clouds on revenue multiple alone. Two companies with similar multiples but different revenue structures are not the same company. ServiceNow's 97% subscription with 98% renewal and 35% FCF margin resembles a digital toll road more than a generic SaaS.
Second error: assuming AI growth is "free optionality". Now Assist and AI agents are priced under consumption-based metering above a fixed credit allotment — meaning part of 2026-2027 ACV growth is already priced into existing contracts. AI is partially a tailwind but is also already absorbed into the base.
Capital allocation 2025 — a step-change in M&A. NOW signed ~$12B of cumulative M&A (Moveworks, Logik.io closed; Veza, Armis pending). The Armis deal alone ($7.75B cash) will require additional debt financing in 2026. Risk: integrating five acquisitions in parallel, plus interest cost on new debt vs. the 1.40% on existing 2030 Notes.
Risks that could break the thesis: (1) Microsoft Copilot consolidating workflow tasks under itself; (2) DOJ enforcement in public sector (Army Suspension & Debarment investigation, Note 18); (3) Failed Armis/Veza integration leading to material impairment.
What separates professional analysis from a "tip": A tip says "stable enterprise software". Professional analysis asks why renewal is 98% and not 92%, why cRPO/Revenue is 0.98, why FCF margin is 35% vs 32% at Salesforce. The answers live in the cohort breakdowns, ACV per customer, and the upfront payment structure of self-hosted contracts ($492M in FY25) — not in the headline.
The difference between surface-level analysis and professional thinking often lies in the variables that are not immediately visible.
This site does not participate in the investment decision. The decision belongs to the client.
8 Sources & Data
#SourceDateType
1ServiceNow 10-K FY2025January 28, 2026Official — SEC EDGAR
2ServiceNow 10-Q Q1 2026April 2026Official — SEC EDGAR
3ServiceNow Annual Report 2025February 2026Official — Investor Relations
🔒

Premium Content — Qualified Investors Only

The full ServiceNow (NOW) analysis is available to Premium members of Bakshi Finance — Family Office. The analysis includes a structured review across 8 sections, charts, scenario framework, and "How to Think About This Company".

Unlock Analysis — $60 $60 per analysis · $900 / year for full access